Chess One wrote:
Can you not discriminate between those people who genuinely engage on
chess
subjects, and those who wish to exacerbate any sort of drama or
excitement,
nomatter what means they use?

I am taking no side in any of the disputes I mentioned (with the
possible exception of Mr. Gordon).

You would make the same those people who would write something about
chess
subjects with those who project any old **** they can't face in
themselves
onto others.

The essential distinction is not between different kinds of people, but
between different kinds of posts. I make no judgement about the people
involved. I say only that these interminable manure-throwing contests
and 'I know you are but what am I?' exchanges are pointless and a
complete waste of time, for both writers and readers.

A terrible post!

I merely offer my opinion and advice. You are free to respond as you
see fit.