lemme see, you called the tournament commitee of the igca 'a bunch of
imposters' because you don't like their decision, but of course my tone
offends you.
i suggest you resort to critiquing the manners of others and disregarding
your own because you are on the losing side of a stupid debate than cannot
be won on the basis of facts and content.
"Znarf" wrote in message
...
It is not BS. My subjective belief is irrelevant; I do not know if he
copied any code or not. My point is that giving a person roughly 48 hours
to answer allegations of copyright infringement and then banning him for a
couple of years is not a fair procedural process. Perhaps the later
poster's recommendation could be used - source code is provided under a
non-disclosure agreement and may be examined ONLY to evaluate copying
allegation.

As for your offensive tone, it is not warranted, and only illustrates the
"guilty until proven innocent" ignorance of unfair people.


"marc margolies" wrote in message
...
since you defend the programmer, then you don't think his 'reputation is
damaged beyond repair" either or you wouldn't bother trying to do just
that.
cut the bull****.