"Taylor Kingston" wrote in message
ups.com...



Which is all very well Taylor, except that you prove my point. You are so
OBSSESSED with afronts you feel you have received that you then plaster
them
over every subject, and here you bore on about anons for another 700
words...

So, in other words, you actually did not mean it when you condemned
jr's anonymity, and you are indifferent to his mendacity?

In the same words I refer again to Taylor Kingstons obsessional attitude to
personalities, not an approach ot objective fact.

----------

The wildly imaginative fiction is YOURS. This thread is not about that.
Go
and Da Vinci Code somewhere else.

So then, you might comment in a thread devoted specifically to jr's
anonymity and mendacity?

Taylor still doesn't understand my comment about what this thread is about -
and continues to obssess on 'jr', nevermind he so obviously denies [or
rather avoids] that he has also written [to himself] as an anon.

No other comment to the nominal subject was evident in this message. What I
wrote about it was snipped. But essentially I ask why graphic design, or
content design is secret in rational to a public non profit, that does not
sell women's underwear as interests Taylor Kingston to mention, but is
ostensibly established to further chess to the greater public?

Phil Innes