Chess One wrote:
"Taylor Kingston" wrote in message
ups.com...



Which is all very well Taylor, except that you prove my point. You are so
OBSSESSED with afronts you feel you have received that you then plaster
them
over every subject, and here you bore on about anons for another 700
words...

So, in other words, you actually did not mean it when you condemned
jr's anonymity, and you are indifferent to his mendacity?

In the same words I refer again to Taylor Kingstons obsessional attitude to
personalities, not an approach ot objective fact.

----------

The wildly imaginative fiction is YOURS. This thread is not about that.
Go
and Da Vinci Code somewhere else.

So then, you might comment in a thread devoted specifically to jr's
anonymity and mendacity?

Taylor still doesn't understand my comment about what this thread is about -
and continues to obssess on 'jr', nevermind he so obviously denies [or
rather avoids] that he has also written [to himself] as an anon.

So your saying it's not OK for me to avoid charges of anonymous
mendacity, but it is OK for jr to avoid them?

No other comment to the nominal subject was evident in this message. What I
wrote about it was snipped.

Do you automatically yell "Snipping!" every time, whether it's true
or not? Check again, I think you'll see I left every one of your
precious words in there, except perhaps your signature at the bottom.
If it does not all appear, all you have to do in Google is click on
"show quoted text" and voila!
Actually I intentionally made sure to leave it all there, just to see
if you'd yell "Snip!" anyway. Thank you for your cooperation.

But essentially I ask why graphic design, or
content design is secret in rational to a public non profit,

Probably for very commonplace reasons, as I wrote earlier. It's only
you and Parr who seem to consider it something clandestine and
sinister. It seems Larry feels compelled continually to claim he is
uncovering malevolent conspiracies. When he doesn't have a real
conspiracy handy, he portrays an ordinary event as an evil omen.

that does not
sell women's underwear as interests Taylor Kingston to mention, but is
ostensibly established to further chess to the greater public?
Phil Innes

I wonder how much better USCF could serve the public if they did not
have to spend so much time dealing with bull from Parr and Innes?