Chess One wrote:
"Taylor Kingston" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chess One wrote:
You could make the same historical error if you didn't know the moves but
not if you were a chess writer - since the game is FAMOUS for the error.

Hey, Phil -- will you tell us _honestly_ when *you* first became
aware of this FAMOUS error?

It's not a diversion at all, Phil. I'm just testing your claim that
any chess writer should already have known this FAMOUS game. Or do you
no longer claim to be a chess writer?

You are getting a bit desperate with this diversion Mr. Kingston. But its
okay to say you never heard of it and never read through the games.

Really - its okay.

It doesn't depend on how many people are equally unaware of what you report.
The problem is that you do not acknowledge it AFTER you know better.

Since I have been through a similar scenario with you in respect of
interviewing Averbakh, on a more sober subject of ****ing over Soviet Jews,
where you said you were under-researched, but then suggested to this
newsgroup that you could not recall our correspondence, are you quite fit
for the job?

I mean, if you admitted to the group that you did 'recall', then after I
returned your e-mails to you - privately - without disclosing them, though
you called me a liar in public - you then neither retracted your statement,
offered an apology [not that I asked for one] nor corrected any record.

And now this guffaw [however human it is to err], it must be asked: why you
care for any objective truth at all?

So, Phil, despite your claim that this is a FAMOUS position, that any
chess writer should know, you are admitting that you did not know of
it?