jr wrote:

How about answering Keene point by point for a change
instead of evading the issue, which is your putrid review?

I am always amused when an anonymouse, who dodges questions about his
own documented lies, adopts an air of moral authority. How about you,
Larry Jr., anwer us point by point on your reverse memory that knows
things in January but finds them "all new" in April? It is hardly fair
to expect to receive answers while giving none.
And speaking of "answering point by point," I repeat my statement of
yesterday: I will be happy to respond to Keene's comments about my
review of his book, on one condition -- that he first acknowledge and
explain, in detail and without evasion, his many documented factual
errors that I have here pointed out, errors which he seems to claim
were never made.