Chess One wrote:
"Chess One" wrote in message
news:HJ15g.413$b77.148@trndny03...
"Taylor Kingston" wrote in message
oups.com...
The Historian wrote:
Taylor Kingston wrote:
wrote:
Hang on. What's this? I'm one of the worst offenders against
historical accuracy!
I trust he's going to produce some evidence for this libel. -- GM
Raymond Keene
As far as legally actionable offenses are concerned, I do not recall
granting permission to GM Keene to reproduce my entire copyrighted
review here. Nor do I recall him even asking for such permission.
Technically, it's Larry Parr that violated your copyright, Taylor,
since Mr. Keene didn't reprint the review. In addition to any legal
line Mr. Parr crossed, he seems to have violated the Code of Ethics of
the Chess Journalists of America. Mr. Parr is a CJA member.
9. No article or other proprietary work may be published without the
necessary proprietary consents.
I note Hanon Russel is a member of CJA; he could ask them to take
action of some kind against Parr.
Thank you, Neil -- I will definitely consider it.
FAIR CHALLENGE?
I strongly suggest that Russel should be contacted - in fact if Taylor
Kingston doesn't I will.
I already have, Phil, but feel free to contact him yourself if you
like. However, I suggest you spell his name correctly.
What we would like to know about where Kingston wrote his
article -Chesscafe - and about the CJA Code of Ethics, that Kingston cites
as authority
I did not cite the CJA.
, is if Hanon Russel, who controls both,
You are saying that Hanon Russell controls the CJA??
thinks Keene's
copyright was abridged by Kinston's review.
Hitting the peyote again, Phil? The issue is whether Keene/Parr's
posting of a large part of *my* copyrighted review, without receiving
or asking permission, is a copyright violation.
What could be fairer than that? 
)
Probably any number of things, but to be sure it would first be
necessary for your position to be comprehensible.