View Single Post
  #16  
Old April 30th 06, 02:40 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Parr violates CJA Code of Ethics (Part 1 of ?)


Chess One wrote:
"Taylor Kingston" wrote in message
oups.com...

The Historian wrote:
Taylor Kingston wrote:
wrote:

Hang on. What's this? I'm one of the worst offenders against
historical accuracy!
I trust he's going to produce some evidence for this libel. -- GM
Raymond Keene

As far as legally actionable offenses are concerned, I do not recall
granting permission to GM Keene to reproduce my entire copyrighted
review here. Nor do I recall him even asking for such permission.

Technically, it's Larry Parr that violated your copyright, Taylor,
since Mr. Keene didn't reprint the review. In addition to any legal
line Mr. Parr crossed, he seems to have violated the Code of Ethics of
the Chess Journalists of America. Mr. Parr is a CJA member.

9. No article or other proprietary work may be published without the
necessary proprietary consents.

I note Hanon Russel is a member of CJA; he could ask them to take
action of some kind against Parr.


Thank you, Neil -- I will definitely consider it.


I was just about to say what benefit there is in writing here compared to
Nolandland.

HYSTORYLAND

But the hapless Kingston choses to take ethical advice from Brennan! g

I would say that the likely result of accepting that advice would be a
countersuit which would sink both Kingston and the CJA,


How can there be a "countersuit" if there is no lawsuit? DId I suggest
any legal action?

since Kingston
quoted FAR more in his own review than is permissable under copyright law -


Excuse me, but where does copyright law in the US set a limit for fair
use? (Folks, this is a trick question.) Also, the issue with the CJA
isn't over fair use guidelines, but the fact that Parr, a CJA member,
reproduced Mr. Kingston's entire article without permission. As I
pointed out, this is a violation of the CJA Code of Ethics.

and Ray Keene is now accused of, in effect, quoting himself inhis reply.

If there is anything else of substance in this post, rahteer than 'abstract
criticism' I am sure someone will reply to it.


As usual, there is next to nothing in your post aside from the errors.

Snip remaining Innes twaddle.

Ads
 

Loans - Magazine Subscriptions - Free Ringtones - Debt Loans - Books