jr wrote:
* This is really odd. Keene & the dunderheads have
anaged to trick the so-called ratpackers into discussing
one of Keene's better works...* (Help Bot)

Mr. Bot finally got something right.

* And speaking of "answering point by point," I repeat my statement of

yesterday: I will be happy to respond to Keene's comments about my
review of his book, on one condition -- that he first acknowledge and
explain, in detail and without evasion, his many documented factual
errors that I have here pointed out, errors which he seems to claim
were never made.* (Kingston)

Translation: This phony will never respond to Keene's devastating
critique of his putrid review because Keene is right.

As I recall, part of Keene's critique was a complaint about the lack of
specificity regarding his historical inaccuracies. I don't see why
Keene should not be expected to respond to previously documented
errors.

Of course, when Bauer criticized Keene, he also demanded chapter and
verse, but he has never responded to those specifications either.