Chess One wrote:
"Taylor Kingston" wrote in message
oups.com...

FAIR CHALLENGE?

I strongly suggest that Russel should be contacted - in fact if Taylor
Kingston doesn't I will.

I already have, Phil, but feel free to contact him yourself if you
like. However, I suggest you spell his name correctly.

What we would like to know about where Kingston wrote his
article -Chesscafe - and about the CJA Code of Ethics, that Kingston
cites
as authority

I did not cite the CJA.

To whom? I thought that was the basis of Brennan's objection? Let me look it
up - why! here it is:-

Technically, it's Larry Parr that violated your copyright, Taylor,
since Mr. Keene didn't reprint the review. In addition to any legal
line Mr. Parr crossed, he seems to have violated the Code of Ethics of
the Chess Journalists of America. Mr. Parr is a CJA member.

I realize, like many, that Philth Innes is insane, but surely he
realizes Taylor Kingston and I are two different persons?

I therefore wonder what you wrote to him? I myself wrote tot he CJA
president this morning in response to a dialogue he initiated with me.

Yeah, sure. Hanken 'initiated' the exchange by asking you to stop
spamming him, most probably.

, is if Hanon Russel, who controls both,

You are saying that Hanon Russell controls the CJA??

No, he controls what may be said about it.

Brattleboro is going to be renamed Peyote Place.

thinks Keene's
copyright was abridged by Kinston's review.

Hitting the peyote again, Phil?

Is that a Californian term?

I'll tell you what - I'll write to CJA on this matter directly and ask what
guidelines they have for protection of copyright,

Please tell us what the response was, Philth.

citing this instance of
your review of Keene. I will mention that your comment seems to be a
drug-culture one, and this was the entire sunstantive reply you made.

Oh, please tell us the response, Philth.

The issue is whether Keene/Parr's
posting of a large part of *my* copyrighted review, without receiving
or asking permission, is a copyright violation.

What could be fairer than that? )

Probably any number of things, but to be sure it would first be
necessary for your position to be comprehensible.

Which is why you snipped it? ROFL

Snip remainder of Innes post.