Randy Bauer wrote:

Sam took a securities case to the U.S. Supreme
Court and WON by 9-0. He is the last non-attorney to
argue successfully before the Court. He would have
had to prevail in a second case to recover his
license, which he had neither the money nor energy to
do. The bureaucrats lost in the courts but they won
out against the individual.

As the Historian has already shown, the WIN had little impact on his
life and was really just a technicality. Bottom line, he lost his
securities license because of misconduct.

How much do you want to bet that Parr claims the SEC was wrong to ban
Sloan from the securities industry? I expect something from him along
the lines of "Sam didn't do anything worse than Jay Gould or the other
robber barons of the Street did in the good old days."

I ask again -- Liarry, how much money have you entrusted to your
securities whiz Sloan?