"John J." wrote in message
.. .
Well, since I don't see too many folks coming to your defence I can
conclude that it's you who needs to understand.

This is typical of the "reasoning" of an idiot. With my university peers we
would refer to this type of argument as: "ARGUMENTUM AD NUMERAM". Get
someone to show you how to use a search engine and look up what that means.
It's a typical logic error that people with a very low IQ, such as yourself,
who are unable to isolate and argue the points, commit often. A good example
of the speciousness of this type of thinking is the "Kasparov vs the World"
exhibition that occurred a few years ago. If it wasn't for the fact that
there was a panel of "experts" (probably more like Grandmasters) to ensure
that "the world" didn't make fatal blunders early, thereby leading to a
boring and uneventful game....it would have been over much earlier and
wouldn't have required a pretty exchange sac that occurred in the actual
game. Mental weaklings like yourself believed that the sheer "collective
force" of some hundreds of thousands of chess enthusiasts, notwithstanding a
mean elo of probably around 1500 or so, would surely produce brilliant
moves! After all, the more people who participate in a decision, the more
"correct" the decision must be, right?

And apparently you STILL can't get it through your thick skull and into your
tiny pea brain that it was YOU who started harassing me for no good reason
whatsoever, and it was also YOU who started making threats, which if you
made in person to me would land you either in the hospital or in the morgue.

And if I did go to Iraq to fight, it would be on the side of the brave Iraqi
freedom fighters who are resisting american zionist controlled interests and
defending their homeland.

Jason Repa