Sam Sloan wrote (Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:54:35 GMT):
I am having a dispute with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
User:Howcheng and I request the Arbitration Committee
to resolve it.
==== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/7/0/0) ====
- * Reject. 'Preposterous' seems the only word, and I can't imagine the
ArbCom wishing to take this on, except as a way of sanctioning
[[User:Sam Sloan]] for posting potential defamation. [[User:Charles
Matthews|Charles Matthews]] 13:05, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- * Reject. Howcheng, has done nothing wrong, and seems to have been
quite reasonable throughout. It does, however, seem like there might be
a case to be made over the conflict between Billbrock and Sam Sloan. -
[[User:SimonP|SimonP]] 14:39, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- * Reject. [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] sup[[User talk:Sam
Korn|(smoddy)]]/sup 17:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- * Reject. [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]]
23:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- * Reject. No case. —[[User:Morven|Matthew Brown]] ([[User
talk:Morven|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Morven|C]]) 00:10, 10 February
2006 (UTC)
- * Reject. [[User
mcdevit|Dmcdevit]]·[[User talk
mcdevit|t]] 08:46,
10 February 2006 (UTC)
- * Reject [[User:The Epopt|➥the Epopt]] 22:32, 10 February 2006
(UTC)
_
(→User:Sam_Sloan against User:Howcheng regarding Tom Dorsch - soundly
rejected)