LOOK WHO'S TALKING!

If Cerebus will carefully examine the newsgroup record
via Google or some such search engine, he will find that
Blair asks "the same questions again and again" only when
the person asked gives no satifactory answer, or no answer
at all. Notorious repeat offenders would be Parr and Innes, who
virtually never answer "inconvenient" questions. -- Taylor Kingston


From: - view profile
Date: Wed, May 24 2006 6:40 am
Email: "
Groups: rec.games.chess.politics, rec.games.chess.misc

QUESTIONS KINGSTON WON'T ANSWER

They were posted here on Tuesday, May 23 2006 6:42 pm
Since then NM Kingston has made two postings in this
thread while completely ignoring them.

Now If my name were Louis Blair, I would repeat them
at least 50 more more times in order to create a diversion
in every other unrelated thread. Speaking of the parser, he
demands answers to "questions" while ignoring the ones
I put to him in "Louie's Mental Mush."

Here, once again, are the questions NM Kingston ignores.

PRACTICING MEDICINE WITHOUT A LICENSE

Instead of practicing medicine without a license,
this guy might try addressing the actual issues raised
by Keene and Parr. -- jr

Parr spits out a string of lies, innuendo and
insults like some bar-room loudmouth and his
sock-puppet calls it "raising issues." If Parr could
keep a civil tongue in his head, he might get some
civil answers now and then -- even though he
scarcely gives any himself. -- Taylor Kingston

What can be more civil? We ask Taylor Kingston,
who has described himself as a man with "standards,"
the following questions:

1A: Did you vote as Xylothist in the Evans poll?

1B: Did you post on rgcp as Xylothist in praise
of your own positions and to attack your enemies?

2A: Did you vote as Paulie Graf in the Evans poll?

2B: Did you post Paulie Graf in praise of your own
positions and to attack your enemies?

3A: Did you vote as Niemand in the Evans poll?

3B: Did you post on as Niemand in praise
of your own positions?

We endeavour to be scrupulously fair with NM
Kingston, our self-described 2300+ ELO time bomb
who is actually rated about 1800.

We have stipulated repeatedly that his overall
work as a book reviewer is better than 90% of the stuff
in chess publications. Even NM Kingston's review of the Soltis
volume, which GM Ray Keene has so effectively savaged,
was an earnest, elaborate effort well beyond what most
chess-book reviewers are willing to make.

What we will not do is to pretend that NM
Kingston did not lie through his teeth when claiming
to be a strong chess master.

What we will not do is to let up on the withering
criticism when NM Kingston employs pseudonyms to
praise himself and his own arguments.

We do not consider his character weakness as
consonant with having those "standards" he boasts about.

We hope that NM Kingston will one day own up to
his lies and his impersonations. There might then be
a fresh beginning for the man on this newsgroup.