ChessBanter - View Single Post

**Taylor Kingston** · May 28th 06, 12:48 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc

wrote:
LOOK WHO'S TALKING!

If Cerebus will carefully examine the newsgroup record
via Google or some such search engine, he will find that
Blair asks "the same questions again and again" only when
the person asked gives no satifactory answer, or no answer
at all. Notorious repeat offenders would be Parr and Innes, who
virtually never answer "inconvenient" questions. -- Taylor Kingston

From: - view profile
Date: Wed, May 24 2006 6:40 am
Email: "
Groups: rec.games.chess.politics, rec.games.chess.misc

QUESTIONS KINGSTON WON'T ANSWER

They were posted here on Tuesday, May 23 2006 6:42 pm
Since then NM Kingston has made two postings in this
thread while completely ignoring them.

Now If my name were Louis Blair, I would repeat them
at least 50 more more times in order to create a diversion
in every other unrelated thread. Speaking of the parser, he
demands answers to "questions" while ignoring the ones
I put to him in "Louie's Mental Mush."

Here, once again, are the questions NM Kingston ignores.

PRACTICING MEDICINE WITHOUT A LICENSE

Instead of practicing medicine without a license,
this guy might try addressing the actual issues raised
by Keene and Parr. -- jr

Parr spits out a string of lies, innuendo and
insults like some bar-room loudmouth and his
sock-puppet calls it "raising issues." If Parr could
keep a civil tongue in his head, he might get some
civil answers now and then -- even though he
scarcely gives any himself. -- Taylor Kingston

What can be more civil? We ask Taylor Kingston,
who has described himself as a man with "standards,"
the following questions:

1A: Did you vote as Xylothist in the Evans poll?

1B: Did you post on rgcp as Xylothist in praise
of your own positions and to attack your enemies?

2A: Did you vote as Paulie Graf in the Evans poll?

2B: Did you post Paulie Graf in praise of your own
positions and to attack your enemies?

3A: Did you vote as Niemand in the Evans poll?

3B: Did you post on as Niemand in praise
of your own positions?

We endeavour to be scrupulously fair with NM
Kingston, our self-described 2300+ ELO time bomb
who is actually rated about 1800.

We have stipulated repeatedly that his overall
work as a book reviewer is better than 90% of the stuff
in chess publications. Even NM Kingston's review of the Soltis
volume, which GM Ray Keene has so effectively savaged,
was an earnest, elaborate effort well beyond what most
chess-book reviewers are willing to make.

What we will not do is to pretend that NM
Kingston did not lie through his teeth when claiming
to be a strong chess master.

What we will not do is to let up on the withering
criticism when NM Kingston employs pseudonyms to
praise himself and his own arguments.

We do not consider his character weakness as
consonant with having those "standards" he boasts about.

We hope that NM Kingston will one day own up to
his lies and his impersonations. There might then be
a fresh beginning for the man on this newsgroup.

Larry, if you want the truth, you have to be willing to give the
truth. You are no more in a position to demand the truth than Hitler
was to complain about anti-Semitism. But I'll give you a chance.
Larry, I will be happy to answer your questions once you meet several
conditions, by admitting various lies by you and certain of your allies
that long antedate the Kingpin matter. The questions below have all
been posed to you well before this, some years ago, some many times.
You've been ducking them ever since:

We have stipulated repeatedly that his overall
work as a book reviewer is better than 90% of the stuff
in chess publications. Even NM Kingston's review of the Soltis
volume, which GM Ray Keene has so effectively savaged ...

1. You will admit that your and Keene's "savaging" of that review was
based on nothing but a lie, and you will agree that the various ways
your lie has been proven by Dr. Blair and myself are entirely accurate.
I will list those ways, and you will admit to each.

2. You will acknowledge that your claims of multiple voting in the
recent Chessville poll are completely without basis, and are motivated
by malice, and you will apologize contritely to all whom you accused.

3. Concerning your 2002 claim that "One of the sillier things stated
by Taylor Kingston in a ChessCafe piece was that no one dared to defy
Stalin's orders if he were in the dictator's grasp." -- You will admit
that I never wrote any such thing, but that you and Larry Evans both
did. You will admit that it was very silly of you to do this.

4. You will acknowledge the lie "jr" made when he pretended ignorance
of my correspondence with Richard Laurie, and you will reprimand him
for it.

5. Concerning Sam Sloan's 2005 claim that "Taylor Kingston is
involved with USCF Sales and is the perpetrator of the blacklist," you
will admit that Sam was completely wrong, that you were wrong not
reprimand him immediately, and you will reprimand him for it now.

6. You will admit that it was highly misleading to claim that you won
an "international Swiss tournament" in 1970, since the event was merely
a typical local tournament involving no titled players.

Of course, I'm letting you off easy, since this is only a tiny
portion of the many lies you have told here. But life is too short to
deal with them all.
Anyway, as the police captain said in LA Confidential, "Reciprocity
is the basis of any good relationship." You want some truth, you gotta
give some truth.