"Louis Blair" wrote in message
oups.com...

Phil Innes repeatedly chose to reproduce the one word,
"meaningless", without including the rest of the sentence. If
Phil Innes had reproduced that comment, it would have been
easily apparent that Phil Innes was lifting that word out of the
Vince Hart sentences and attaching it to PI's own theories
about Vince Hart's thinking.

Which was zero. Hart invited me to make a contribution on the basis of a set
of standards, which he then termed 'meaningless' [see below]. Which
presumably means that the matter is dismissed as without sense, or that the
person cannot ascribe a meaning of their own to it. shrug

What is it that L. Blair doesn't understand?

If there is a meaning at all to a contribution to the basis of a discussion
I seem to be the only person making it, of those who had any quare or
interest in debating it.

PI

"... dismissing others' as 'meaningless,' ..." - Phil Innes
(Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:40:22 GMT)
_
"You dismissed Pehme's site and his commissioned
article as 'meaningless'." - Phil Innes (Sat, 01 Apr 2006
00:12:42 GMT)
_
"when I wrote to that subjct [of general standards
Vinny] dismissed it as 'meaningless'" - Phil Innes
(Mon, 03 Apr 2006 12:52:20 GMT)