Kane wrote
Yeah ... damn those empirical FBI/DOJ statistics
that show PARENTS/RELATIVES
are far and away the #1 killer of young children.

That's a half truth.

With most of the EXPOSURE, this is natural.

If you take EXPOSURE into account, blood
parents don't look so bad, not by a longshot!

People who are NOT related by blood have
a huge percentage considering EXPOSURE.


Kane wrote
So when you find a dead fish in your cat's bowl
of milk, you immediately begin
looking at the dog, right?

You don't have a cat do you?
You're not supposed to be feeding cats milk!
Falling into an old incorrect cliche'?

Pushing the CLICHE' and ignoring other
possibilities is a botched investigation.
It's just the EASY thing for lazy bureaucrats to do.

"Round up the usual suspects!" is just plain dumb.