Greegor wrote:
Kane wrote
And please don't give me the [e.d.] that foster parents don't have as
much or more exposure. Compared to partying parents they run about 24/7,
easily.

So your argument just crapped out, Greg.

Um, Kane, are you arguing backwards or what?

No, your argument crapped out. Bio parents can conceal their child
whenever they wish. Foster's cannot do that.

In a year in the USA, Foster contractors have
only a small percentage of the exposure hours.

I offered logical argument and facts that support my claim.

Show me yours? Where do you come by this percentage of exposure hours?
Give me a number, not small...a number.

I can tell you that the child is seen by SOMEONE outside the foster home
on average 3 to four hours a week, more if they are in school. The
foster parent must open their home to every child's worker, once a
month, for one to two hour visits, PER CHILD.

Are they not subject to providing access to the child continuously? Do
they not have to allow various practitioners to see them?

Part of putting a child in state custody is the rehabilitation aspect.
This requires Dx, evaluation, and Tx, trips to see OTs, MDs,
Psychologists and even pediatricians and dentists.

A bio parent can get out of all these things if they wish. A foster
parent cannot.

All children are required to have a face to face, in the foster home,
with their worker, once every 30 days. Foster home supervisors also
visit on a monthly basis.

Every child in the home, unless a sibling, is likely to have a different
worker than the next, hence there will be multiple agency visits TO THE
FOSTER HOME

Their percentage of abuse is greater than their
percentage of exposure.

Empty babbling. You don't know the "percentage of their exposure" so you
sure as hell can't make a comparison between abuse percentages and
exposure percentages.

They abuse percentage is a tiny fraction of that of the parents
substantiated for abuse, Greg. Over 90%, and more including relatives.

You got a foster parent abuse percentage number you want to share with us?

In Texas, the likelihood of abuse by a foster
is 4x the level in parents homes.

How can they be. The child isn't IN the parent's home. They are in state
care.

The ONLY reasonable comparison has to be limited to client parent vs
foster parent.

An actual count of real abuse in bio homes is virtually impossible.
Unless there is an allegation there will NEVER BE A DISCOVERY OF ABUSE.

With foster parents there are literally a dozen or more people they are
exposed to on a regular basis that can and do report them...often for
things they didn't do, or for things that WOULD NOT BE ABUSE IF DONE BY
A PARENT.

Nevertheless they, because of their contract and training, AND THE STATE
STATUTES that make them MORE accountable than bio parents, are charge
with abuse for 'spanking,' or sending a child to bed without their supper.

You and yours are liars, Greg. Plain and simple.

Bit here I am, awaiting your proof for your claims.

Have at it.

Or are you too good to lower yourself to having to explain your claims?

Greg the Magnificent, is it?

0:-

--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else)