"help bot" wrote in message
oups.com...

David Kane wrote:

Perhaps you need a refresher course in logical thinking.
This strawman of yours may well be fun, but it has no
bearing on the case. Not one poster here has argued
that Fischer "was likely to lose" w/o Bxh2 -- that is, until
you showed up! LOL

Newsflash. Games are either won, lost or drawn.
If Black's not going to lose (or win), then it's (dead) drawn.


Oversimplification. Tell me, are you working your
way through a standard textbook on invalid reasoning,
or have you managed all this on your own? The latter
would be a very impressive feat, IMO. Sort of like
Fischer's 6-0 victories, but a feat of stupidity, not genius!


Like saying that a player has no winning
chances, but yet has an advantage??

Or stating that it is a "lie" to claim that the position
is "dead drawn" yet understanding that Black
can easily hold the draw??

Usually you are a funny guy, and those
few times when you have a point you
are worth reading if not always convincing.

But in this case you sound suspiciously
like Larry Parr making his asinine
claim about Taylor Kingston
lying about his rating.

You don't need to go the Parr/Innes/Brennan
route of distortion and misdirection. Just
admit you blew it (it happens - we'll forgive
you) - then get back on track by savaging
Evans et al. for something they really deserve.