"I myself took the pledge not to respond to me, so I know how he feels.
I have no idea how you feel, because I have never been either so
fixated
on a person that I write about them all the time, even to say who is
not
writing about them...." (Phil Innes)

Note to the Innes-bashers and Parr-bashers:
Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad.


Chess One wrote:
"g4" wrote in message
...
Phil Innes has retured to our kitchen ... I mean, forum. And true to their
word, neither Neil Brennen nor Larry Tapper have responded to Innes,
just like they pledged. Ditto for Taylor Kingston and James Rynd. Great!

Agree!

There's little or no reason why intelligent men should answer Innes'
foolishness
with foolishness of their own.

O - unintended irony there.

Innes, being deprived of the negative attention that he seeks, is so bored
that he's responding predominantly to the Evans ratpackers.

Sonner or later we will begin talking about chess, and then you can say,
'responding predominantly to the chess ratpackers.'

And guess
what? Even larry parr does not respond to Phil Innes! LOL! Now doesn't
that beat everything.

I myself took the pledge not to respond to me, so I know how he feels. I
have no idea how you feel, because I have never been either so fixated on a
person that I write about them all the time, even to say who is not writing
about them, and neither have I ever hidden the fact of who I am, and always
owned by own stupid opinions.

You lack the balls to own your own comments and to address chess in a chess
newsgroup - you too should take the pledge - its intended for such as
yourself.

Phil Innes