A WOUND SO DEEP


Parrthenon speaks:

NMnot Taylor Kingston speaks of countering
habitual falsehoods.

We await his explanation about how he uttered no
falsehoods or attempted to mislead when he praised
himself -- for Pete's sake! -- under the names of
Paulie Graf and Xylothist.


Could Mr. Parr be so kind as to at least provide evidence
that these posters named above -- Polygraph and Xylothist --
have posted from the same vicinity as Taylor Kingston? Not
that that would prove anything, but at least it would be more
substantive than a mere Larry Parr fantasy, based upon
emptyness and pain.



Our class
A-rated player wrote as follows: "Still, on the
subject of playing strength, I have never claimed to
be any great player, but I think with a peak Elo of
2300+, and a top ranking of, as I recall, #46 in the
country, I was a tad better than weak."


Every time Mr. Parr goes down this road, he again
embarasses only himself; TK now has a 50-0 record
at GetClub.com, on top of his correspondence rating
which puts the Evans ratpackers to shame. IMO,
their only truly strong player is Larry Evans himself,
yet the rat pack wannabes, like Mr. Parr and "IM" Innes,
wish to pretend it is they who set the standard for chess
play. LOL!


As I see it, the most ludicrous claim to fame discussed
here is not TK having mentioned his "2300+" rating, it is
Ray Keene's self-description as "the world's foremost
authority" on chess and mindsports. That was a real gas!

In comparison, it is hardly worth mentioning boasts by
such worthies as Phil Innes and Mig Greengard to near-
IM status, let alone quibbling about the worth of a rating
which was earned in correspondence play as opposed to
OTB. As usual, Larry Parr is lost in a fog of delusion.


-- help bot