"Rob" wrote in message
ps.com...

Taylor Kingston wrote:
Chess One wrote:
Mr. Kingston! recently you said i wrote all sorts of lies, and so i
challenged you to a match - in court - you then retracted each one and
retreated into vaguery ...

Our Phil, after a brief and unsuccessful dabbling with the invention
of ficticious languages, returns to his usual pastime, the invention of
fictitious events.


This entire conversation began
with me asking a question of Neil. It was, will he retract his
statements calling Chessville, "Chess-vile" now that he has been
published in it?

He asked some questions comprising a hundred words, so I don't quite think
he is exactly published in his own right, as much as his own publisher being
indulged in offering an interview with this, somewhat contentious, and
certainly boring, jhistorical view of things as proposed by his interviewee.
If the article had achieved more hits it might be worth further response.

Since he managed to write discreditably about persons, while mentioning over
his sig that he was a 'chessville author', his further attentions to any
subject cannot be countenanced, since it is not in the admitted meagre work
he did, but his disporting on what that might mean, which is objectionable
to a leader in the chess community. I should have no difficulty in letting
this be known to Mr. Cambell, with whom I write on other subjects, and who
is an intelligent person, though no cause seems strong enough to promote the
subject.

Phil Innes

He then proceeded to drag red herrings into the
conversations and attempted to provoke me into a personal confrontation
in an attempt to dodge the question and suppress the conversation.

Rob