wrote in message
oups.com...

I had no idea I was offering an actual solution -

"A simpler solution: Dissolve the profit-driven scholastic chess
movement ...."

as I noted, I simply
provided a contrary view or "solution", thinking that, as with most
things, the answer lies somewhere between the two extremes.


But now that I understand that even discussion of scholastic chess by
folks like me is very dangerous. Strange animal, this scholastic chess.


Am I not allowed to express a preference for *informed* discussion?

Boys throw stones at frogs for sport; the frogs, they die in earnest.