Scholastic chess ignorance
David Kane wrote:
He certainly has not explain the connection between profit
and child molestation, and it is not obvious to me. Combined
with him seeing sin in the selling of water, and having some
unarticulated theory that soccer moms are being financially
exploited, his distrust of profit seems to go well beyond
anything to do with chess.
I don't distrust profit at all in the proper context. You evidently
don't know enough about the Peterson selling of water story to
understand it; I suggest you educate yourself first before shooting
your mouth off. Or if you do, then, yes, in this case, the profit
motive was one of pure greed.
You don't represent yourself very well, and you continually attribute
statements and thoughts to me that I don't have. And yes, you are
trying to misrepresent my views. But it isn't working, in my opinion.
Every post you make is another attempt to backpedal or blur the lines.
I would give up, but I imagine you are fool enough to continue in your
illogical delusions.
Perhaps actual discussion of the topic would be superior to this, but
your capabilities for doing so seem to be zero.
|