Henri Arsenault wrote:
"help bot" wrote:
Henri, please note that we geniuses prefer to be given
*links* which we can easily click on, as opposed to having
to *labor* in search of some given article in parts unknown.

Since I don't remember links by heart, why should it be easier for me to
google "chess scientific american" to get the link than you?

This will get you the link

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?art...4C1-8F9E83414B

That link has been truncated. Correct is

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?art...9E83414B7F4945

I don't want to get into this catfight but I'd recommend that, if
you've just been reading an article on the web and want to talk about
it here, it's a good idea to include the link. Little mistakes aside,
it't not difficult and it saves everyone time.


Dave.

--
David Richerby Evil Widget (TM): it's like a thingy
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ but it's genuinely evil!