Recently I wrote of Taylor Kingston's activities in reference to Chesscafe.
He replied without any contradiction to what I wrote. His choice of reply
was the typical ad hominem means he has adopted.

I felt compelled to contradict him for an earlier message on his intent re
Larry Evans, according to what he wrote me, which he now /changes/ when
writing in public.

I have 20-some of his e-mails from the same period, and I intend to publish
them if this lying continues. Kingston is already caught in the lie of his
messages re Evans, that he would ONLY go to put a word in the ear of the new
Ex Dir, and simply changes what he wants us to understand from his public
writing, in complete and utter contrast to what he wrote in his private
campaign.

The issue is book banning by the most popular authors in the US and whatever
his and chesscafe's role is in that.

I understand he denies that what I say is true, so perhaps he should
consider the proofs of his own words, and continue to contradict me, or sue.
I would certainly consider a counter-suit.

I have had enough of this culture of lying, and I think goody-two-shoes
needs to be exposed for the failed and bitter wannabe author he is, along
with all his spite against those who have achieved something in chess.

Phil Innes