Matt Nemmers wrote:

I thought you'd already decided to publish "The Kingston Files," Phil.

I offered to.

No, you said, and I quote, "[Matt]...you have convinced me that the
Kingston files are necessary." You said that less than three months
ago. Not an "offering;" a necessity.

Didn't you agree that after all the hemming and hawing they were
necessary in order to prove your case?

I don't care to make 'any case' other than contrast the record of Kingstons
public/private views - which are the real ones?

Phil, we went over this already, too. Of COURSE you care to make a
case. If you didn't you'd just clam up about it and let this dead
horse rot.

He can't, Matt. The Innestroll needs to draw attention to itself, and
if possible slam a critic as well. After four years, his complaints
that I 'stalked' the Nearly an IM, or his blood relations, or his pet
hamster, or.... have grown thin. So now he's moved on to Taylor
Kingston.

(snip)

Like I said a while back: Put up or shut up, Phil.

I vote for the second.