In my other game against the same player i remembered a fischer maneuver,
with knight to h5 as black, from his iceland game against spassky, so played
that too at move 16. it also offers a pawn, or at least to double pawns on
the h file - but seemed indicated here as sufficient diversion to central
play - is this also a TN? Should white have accepted it? If so, should white
have tried to capitalise on it by also moving to capture the advanced h pawn
rather than he did in the game, and defend the center with 18. Qd2? Phil


1. c4 Nf6
2. d4 c5
3. d5 e6
4. Nc3 exd5
5. cxd5 d6
6. e4 a6
7. a4 g6
8. Be2 Bg7
9. Nf3 O-O
10. O-O Re8
11. Qc2 Bg4
12. h3 Bxf3
13. Bxf3 Nd7
14. Bf4 Ne5
15. Be2 Rc8
16. b3 Nh5
17. Bxh5 gxh5
18. Qd2 Ng6
19. Re1 Bxc3
20. Qxc3 Nxf4
21. Qg3 Ng6
22. f4 h4
23. Qg4 Kh8
24. Qf3 Qf6
25. Qe3 Qd4
26. Kh2 Qxe3
27. Rxe3 c4
28. bxc4 Rxc4
29. f5 Ne5
30. Rb1 Rxa4
31. Rxb7 Kg7
32. g4 Ra2
33. Kg1 Rc8
34. Rb1 Rc2
35. Kh1 Rf2
36. Kg1 Nf3

white resigns