Chess One wrote:
Dear Larry,

I am becoming desperate. The boyos are reduced to asking 'as if' questions,
as if they were creating an alternative universe, and they are really boring
me!

If you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch.

Even Louis can't think of anything more than to repeat the Dowd forgery
line. Matt Demon is fascinated by the Kingston files but can't think of any
questions for Kingston himself,

Questioning TK isn't necessary. He's already flatly DENIED that what
you say you have doesn't exist. Several times. I haven't asked you
any in-depth questions either, now that you mention it. I've simply
asked you to publish the evidence you have that shows TK to be the
out-and-out liar you claim he is. You haven't. And the only thing
you've offered in its stead is a bunch of lame excuses.

Those are the FACTS, Mr. Innes. And they are undisputed.

and Dowd has disappeared [no doubt perforce
important work!], and Mr Kennedy-not is trying hard to pick fights, but
nothing worth more than a line of response, and then its all like the
movies.

sniff

Only Taylor Kingston can be said to be holding the fort by resolutely
denying everything!

There you go! Finally, you see what I've been trying to tell you. He
denies you have anything. You bet (bluffed?); he called. Time to
reveal your hand.

I posted a couple of recent game scores in chess.misc not knowing the name
of one, for which I am an idiot! Not that it has a name... I only asked.

People calling you names? *******s.

SNIPPED groveling and asskissing (a term which is not meant to be
homoerotic, Phil)

Put up or shut up, Phil. You have danced around the issue long enough.
You already look pretty damn silly, but the longer you wait the
sillier you look.

It only gets worse...