"Matt Nemmers" wrote in message
oups.com...
Chess One wrote:
Dear Larry,

I am becoming desperate. The boyos are reduced to asking 'as if'
questions,
as if they were creating an alternative universe, and they are really
boring
me!

If you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch.

BARK IT, IF YOU GOT IT

Big dogs, Matt? You have to be kidding!

Kingston puts the tail on the worng end of the dog, as usual and seems to
have convinced Matt its 'too hot in the kitchen' - and he sensibly has
suggested leaving the kitchen to the porch, and beyond.

But I indicated the opposite to Larry, its so cool its boring. And nothing
new is revealed here, except that Kingston has impressed Matt with a vague
denial - too vague in fact to answer.

Even Louis can't think of anything more than to repeat the Dowd forgery
line. Matt Demon is fascinated by the Kingston files but can't think of
any
questions for Kingston himself,

Questioning TK isn't necessary. He's already flatly DENIED that what
you say you have doesn't exist.

Ha! What? I say I had some 20 e-mails on a similar subject scanning one
month. But if you don't want to ask him, that's fine. Was this what he
denied?

Several times. I haven't asked you
any in-depth questions either, now that you mention it. I've simply
asked you to publish the evidence you have that shows TK to be the
out-and-out liar you claim he is.

Why should I publish someone's material when they don't deny it exists? Its
news to me that TK has denied these things exist!

You haven't. And the only thing
you've offered in its stead is a bunch of lame excuses.

'Excuses' for not wanting to publish other's e-mail are 'lame'?

Those are the FACTS, Mr. Innes. And they are undisputed.

Whether my reservation is lame, or a reticence for some other reason, is the
only undisputed factor here.

and Dowd has disappeared [no doubt perforce
important work!], and Mr Kennedy-not is trying hard to pick fights, but
nothing worth more than a line of response, and then its all like the
movies.

sniff

Only Taylor Kingston can be said to be holding the fort by resolutely
denying everything!

There you go! Finally, you see what I've been trying to tell you. He
denies you have anything. You bet (bluffed?); he called. Time to
reveal your hand.

That's not a bet where I come from! ROFL. Nobody has ante'd up!

What depends on it? Somewhere along the line you have come to believe
Kingston and what I want to know if how that came about.

Does he actually deny that the e-mails exist? OR Does he deny that their
contents are about books and commentaries by Parr, Evans, Schiller, Laurie,
Keene?

I posted a couple of recent game scores in chess.misc not knowing the
name
of one, for which I am an idiot! Not that it has a name... I only asked.

People calling you names? *******s.

I cried. But I'm over it now.

SNIPPED groveling and asskissing (a term which is not meant to be
homoerotic, Phil)

Its well known there are no poofters in the Navy, Matt, although I never
understood why you all wore those cute girl's hats?

Put up or shut up, Phil. You have danced around the issue long enough.
You already look pretty damn silly, but the longer you wait the
sillier you look.

I didn't know looking good was the name of the game? I thought we were
discussing what's fair and unfair commentary.

It only gets worse...

As expected, the situation gets Vaguer and Vaguer - so after reading this
report of what Matt has come to understand I am left wondering what is
actually in question.

Do the e-mails exist?
Or
Are their contents as I say they are? It seems important to others to sort
this out right away, but no-one can state of any /reason/ to do so, by
saying what depends on it.

Kingston has cast some doubt into Matt's mind, but what doubt that is I
don't know. At least I haven't read Kingston directly deny the materials
exist, only that they //directly// had nothing to do with book buying policy
at chesscafe.

All it will take now is for Louis to ask if someone could have hacked
Kingston's accounts

Phil Innes