Larry, help!@
Chess One wrote:
SNIP
Obviously Phil is bound and determined to never, ever show anyone the
evidence he claims to have against Kingston. I don't care one way or
the other -- I just like to stir the pot -- but since this Phil has dug
his heels in this whole issue has become tiresome.
Phil's not going to prove what he's been saying he CAN prove all this
time, everyone. He just wants you all to take him at his word: That
he has the goods and Taylor's a big, fat liar-liar-pants-on-fire.
Personally, I don't buy it -- not that Phil cares or should care. I
just wanted to see if he would actually publish the goods like he told
me he would in August. sigh
But whatever.
I now return you to your regularly scheduled RGCP rants and flame wars.
|