"Louis Blair" wrote in message
ups.com...

"It is Phil Innes who brings up the subject of proof
[that he received 2 messages from Dowd]. Phil
Innes may prefer that others do not comment on
his proof claims, but he is not necessarily going to
get his wish. ..." - Louis Blair (31 Oct 2006
09:56:52 -0800)

I may prefer, suggests Louis, trying to retreat instead of ante-up. Blair in
effect calls me a liar, then retreats. I call him a coward.

How strange that SBD, or someone pretending to be as arrogant,
foul-tempered, ignorant, and so full of himself, he lectured me of a part of
Germany he had not been to [ROFL] but which I had - should have written me
this very day!

This no doubt false person finished his contribution to chess by saying that
he had blocked replies. How brave! I thought.

I expect Louis to demand proofs for ever more - while continuing to come up
with hypothetic possibilities of his own invention, increasingly
fantastical - just as he suggested to everyone here, including Matt who took
him seriously, that there was some permission to quote Kingston.

Was that a lie, or did he misunderstand Vaguer?

We have Louis's idea of falsifying an AOL account, and the other a what? An
untruth.

100,000 words from Louis on these two, and still nothing! No chess anyway.
I'll watch a few more of Louis's posts to see if he actually can bring
himself to say anything, rather than negatively suppose on others - but
either way - the guy is a ****.

Phil Innes