Louis Blair wrote:
Path:
g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e3g2000cwe. googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Taylor Kingston"
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.misc
Subject: The Kingston Files
Date: 2 Nov 2006 05:59:18 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 24
Message-ID: . com
References: ZXR1h.5655$pU3.1248@trndny08
.com
nZ02h.4726$WB4.4244@trndny04
. com
if32h.5156$OK3.2588@trndny09
.com
zx72h.5565$dx4.1663@trndny05
om
. com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.49.184.240
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1162475962 27463 127.0.0.1 (2 Nov 2006
13:59:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:59:22 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: . com
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0;
AT&T CSM6.0),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To:
Injection-Info: e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=24.49.184.240;
posting-account=EiI5yw0AAACV86a5CGNajLjBxzUoGk-N
On Nov 2, 1:09 am, "Matt Nemmers" wrote:
Louis Blair wrote:
This incident (particularly the Phil Innes notion of "permission"
to publicize private communication) would be worth keeping
in mind for those who might be thinking about having a private
conversation with Phil Innes in the future.
Louis, TK gave him permission.
Not so, Matt. I have never given Innes permission to publish any
private correspondence.
Besides, I have a feeling that nothing
WILL be posted because the emails probably do not exist.
Innes and I used to correspond fairly often, before he became
irrationally hostile. He may have saved e-mails of mine from back then;
I probably have a few of his, too. However, he cannot possibly have any
e-mails of mine that prove his accusations of book-banning and the
like, because I never wrote any such. In that sense, the e-mails Phil
claims to have do not exist.
Okay. I know Phil will not publish anything he feels honor bound not to
publish, even something from an enemy. If he gets permission to publish
emails he feels prove this(something TK says doesn't exist) will TK
give permission? To me, if I KNEW that something didn't exist I would
say publish away. If I thought there may be something that would prove
me wrong then I would do just as TK has done and hide from the issue.
Matt simply wants to see the proof that TK says isn't there and refuses
to give Phil permission to share publicly.