"Matt Nemmers" wrote in message
ups.com...
Chess One wrote:
SNIP

Obviously Phil is bound and determined to never, ever show anyone the
evidence he claims to have against Kingston.

Just two days ago you and Louis were calling me a liar because the messages
didn't exist - today you pass on that - and now suggest that something else
is a lie?

They are only 'claims' since Kingston won't speak in the open - and that, I
suppose he does for his own reasons.

I don't care one way or
the other -- I just like to stir the pot -- but since this Phil has dug
his heels in this whole issue has become tiresome.

Not as tiresome I imagine as if you were an author whose books were banned.

Phil's not going to prove what he's been saying he CAN prove all this
time, everyone.

Isn't he?

He just wants you all to take him at his word:

At least what was a lie yesterday isn't anymore, and you know, I am willing
to put the stuff up there, but Kingston says no. shrug

That
he has the goods and Taylor's a big, fat liar-liar-pants-on-fire.

Personally, I don't buy it -- not that Phil cares or should care. I
just wanted to see if he would actually publish the goods like he told
me he would in August. sigh

But whatever.

In the Dowd affair Louis even suggested that the messages were false. So -
in order to entertain you guys and your liar-of-the-day posts, what does it
mean if things are proved or unproved.

Strangely talk of having no balls to do it seems centered around me - but
I'll post em. Its Kingston who doesn't want it done, and for reasons he does
not offer.

What are you going to do if your read stuff such as I posted in the previous
message about the chesscafe forum? What if you see its true?

I now return you to your regularly scheduled RGCP rants and flame wars.

Not necessary if people don't mess with other people and treat them with
respect. What is missing in these threads and in some areas of public chess
writing is enough light and air that will wring-out the truth of who is
influencing what.

If readers here can't figure out who is suppressing stuff, and wants it kept
in the dark, and who wants to open up the subject, they are sleepwalking.

Phil Innes