Thread
:
Elo on Fischer's conditions vs. Karpov
View Single Post
#
6
November 5th 06, 09:13 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
Louis Blair
external usenet poster
Posts: 2,096
Elo on Fischer's conditions vs. Karpov
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
Path:
g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m73g2000cwd .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "help bot"
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.misc
Subject: Elo on Fischer's conditions vs. Karpov
Date: 4 Nov 2006 18:10:17 -0800
Organization:
http://groups.google.com
Lines: 38
Message-ID: .com
References: . com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.2.9.152
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1162692623 21189 127.0.0.1 (5 Nov 2006
02:10:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 02:10:23 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To:
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To:
Injection-Info: m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.2.9.152;
posting-account=9BIrBw0AAAB7iLUVDUl7NdGh5tPTwbP2
Jud McCranie wrote:
On 4 Nov 2006 14:58:54 -0800, "
wrote:
1. If the match at any time stands at 9:9 it indicates an
equality between the contestants.
3. Thus a win by either player in the next decisive game shows
no superiority any more than a single throw of a coin shows a
superiority of heads or tails.
This doesn't make any sense to me. Whomever wins the next game as won
10 to 9.
4. A 9:9 result then is properly declared a drawn match since
the challenger has shown no clear superiority.
If the challenger won the next game, it would be 10 to 9, and he would
have shown a clear superiority.
If it is a match until one player wins 10 games, then the challenger
needs to have the opportunity to win that 10th game, if it is 9 to 9.
I would have expected better logic by Elo, but he was pretty old at
that time.
My impression was that either Dr. Elo was making some
kind of odd joke, or else his logic cells were just burnt out.
In particular, step number 3 falls flat on its face when it
mistakenly tries to equate a toss of a coin (random chance)
to GM Fischer winning that 10th game. (Insert Blairian
quote here, of GM Fischer stating that chess is a game of
*skill*.)
-- help bot
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Louis Blair
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Louis Blair
Find all threads started by Louis Blair
Ads
Myspace Layouts
-
Xbox Mod Chip
-
Mortgage
-
Homeowner Loans
-
Mortgage