Question about Philip Innes AKA Phil Innes
Rob wrote:
Now my feelings are hurt Mark. See, whenever I post something I have
this person who wants to attack me. He just did it again. I never
mentioned him, I never attacked him, yet he feels the need to inject
himself into any thread in which Mr. Innes or myself are discussing a
topic.
It sounds as if "Rob" has carefully monitored not only
the threads in which he posts, but also the threads in
which Phil Innes posts as well. Interesting. I am
beginning to wonder if "Rob" is to IM Innes, as those
posters Larry Parr is always complaining about are to
Taylor Kingston. Except of course that instead of
"praising" (or simply agreeing with) TK, Rob's main
function would be to defend PI by accompanying him
everywhere he posts.
At any rate, this might explain why it is that "Rob"
never seems to mind certain things, *except* when
they inconvenience Phil Innes. To clairify: PI "defends"
LP, while "Rob" defends PI. But wait -- who is going
to defend "Rob"? That leaves him wide open! Someone
is not holding up his end on this "team", or rather,
confederacy of dunces.
-- help bot
|