Phil Innes wrote (Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:25:41 GMT):
7 ... I looked at the USCF site this morning and reported on the
7 $10,000 'award', which is this week's scandal, and also how
7 it was treated at the Nolanland forum by a moderator - which
7 even a Rhino's skin would register as rash and offensive
7 abuse of speech.
_
I wrote (13 Dec 2006 20:01:22 -0800):
7 Is Phil Innes claiming that the moderator treated the subject
7 with "rash and offensive abuse of speech"? If so, where are
7 the examples?
_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:21:30 GMT):
7 Is Louis Blair asking me if he can understand what I wrote?
7 I think he is asking me that. OTOH, he could be asking me
7 if I 'claim' I wrote what I did.
7
7 Louis Blair doesn't understand where these examples are
7 from what I wrote, even though I wrote Nolandland, which
7 he forgot to snip ;(
_
I wrote (14 Dec 2006 11:20:00 -0800):
7 Only Phil Innes can identify what he considers to be a
7 specific example. He, of course, prefers not to.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:07:21 GMT):

7 I win! He has asked me to identify what he snipped - and
7 though I wrote whay he snipped, and then wrote that he
7 would ask me to be specific about his snip,

_
Nonsense. I am asking Phil Innes to be specific about
his charges against the moderator.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:07:21 GMT):

7 he concludes I prefer not to be 'specific' - though maybe
7 he means I will not repost the specific text that he cut?

_
No. I see nothing that I would call specific in any of the
notes mentioned above.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:07:21 GMT):

7 Anyway, only I can do it, whatever the it is. ...

_
"Only Phil Innes can identify what he considers
to be a specific example." - Louis Blair (14 Dec 2006
11:20:00 -0800)

_
Phil Innes wrote (Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:25:41 GMT):
7 I also noticed the less-than-honest reporting about Tanner,
7 which had no mention at all about an ethics scandal, ...
_
I wrote (13 Dec 2006 20:01:22 -0800):
7 What "reporting" is Phil Innes writing about? Phil Innes
7 wouldn't want us to think that he was being deliberately
7 vague, would he? ...
_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:21:30 GMT):
7 Luois Blair, or Blairs, speaking in the plural, has done his
7 usual thing of cutting text then asking a question about it,
_
I wrote (14 Dec 2006 11:20:00 -0800):
7 Nonsense. I quoted the text that I was asking about. See
7 above, where it is quoted again.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:07:21 GMT):

7 ... The text that mentioned USCF was cut.

_
One instance of Phil Innes mentioning USCF is reproduced
above (and has been reproduced in my previous notes in
this exchange). In any event, mentioning USCF does not
tell us what "reporting about Tanner", Phil Innes was writing
about.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:07:21 GMT):

7 Therefore we learn two things - one, Louis insists it is
7 somewhere above, though I pointedly said it was cut, and
7 two, he has requoted the wrong text which quite obviously
7 he can't understand, since as I wrote above - it's the wrong
7 text.

_
What I wrote:
_
"I quoted the text that I was asking about."
- Louis Blair (14 Dec 2006 11:20:00 -0800)
_
That statement is true.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:21:30 GMT):
7 and unusual for him, or them, has come immediately tot
7 he point. 'Vague' he says. Telling me that I would hate to
7 be thought of as vague by them.
7
7 Perhaps the answer is at the USCF website, or the
7 backside of the moon? Perhaps 'we' could think which of
7 those are more likely locations, but most likely 'we' won't
7 and instead 'we' will demand to know what text 'we' cut,
7 and whooppee! I can definitely keep this sucker going til
7 christmas and win another $5 bet.
_
I wrote (14 Dec 2006 11:20:00 -0800):
7 It, of course, is not a surprise that Phil Innes also does
7 not want to be specific about this matter.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:07:21 GMT):

7 Be specific about what matter?

_
It, of course, is not a surprise that Phil Innes also does not
want to specifically identify the "reporting about Tanner"
that he was writing about.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:07:21 GMT):

7 Where the backside of the moon is?

_
No. See above.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:07:21 GMT):

7 Be specific about if Louis should think about where it
7 could be,

_
Only Phil Innes can identify what he considers to be
"less-than-honest reporting about Tanner".

_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:07:21 GMT):

7 or even that the text that was cut, which ipso facto was
7 a specific to itself, or if asking some or all these questions
7 is nothing I want to be specific about [again].

_
Mentioning USCF does not tell us what "reporting about
Tanner", Phil Innes was writing about.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:07:21 GMT):

7 Is Louis Blair still claiming he is specific about any of
7 those, or maybe something else? Something lost, something
7 blue, something in Nottingham, or something to do with 'matter'?
7
7 There is a lot of money riding on if he feels compelled to answer.

_
I am seeking identification of specific examples of the moderator
behavior to which Phil Innes objects. I am also seeking a specific
identification of the supposed "less-than-honest reporting about
Tanner".