Phil Innes wrote (Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:05:00 GMT):
7 ... [Wasn't Taylor Kingston] the guy who wrote me about
7 what banned authors should have no right of reply at
7 ChessCafe's own forum? ...
_
I wrote (15 Dec 2006 10:44:37 -0800):
7 ...
7 "... Of course you haven't written [emails] 'about' book
7 banning, and I have never said you have written them
7 'about book banning' ..." - Phil Innes (to Taylor
7 Kingston) (Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:15:14 GMT)
_
Phil Innes wrote (Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:56:05 GMT):
7 ... IF he were interested he could ask Kingston directly
7 what his opinions are and were - even to the
7 specific extent IF authors could respond in the same
7 forum as their books are being criticised.
7
7 But I rather doubt IF Louis Blair will do that, or IF he is
7 actually interested in the topic, since I do not
7 understand IF he is interested in any topic.
_
I wrote (16 Dec 2006 19:27:06 -0800):
7 ... Phil Innes quietly drops the issue of book-banning
7 while making his suggestion.
7
7 I will not follow the suggestion of Phil Innes as I have
7 no desire to be distracted from the question of whether
7 or not there is writing about book-banning in the emails.
7
7 "... [Wasn't Taylor Kingston] the guy who wrote
7 me about what banned authors should have no
7 right of reply at ChessCafe's own forum? ..."
7 - Phil Innes (Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:05:00 GMT)
7
7 "... Of course you haven't written [emails] 'about' book
7 banning, and I have never said you have written them
7 'about book banning' ..." - Phil Innes (to Taylor
7 Kingston) (Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:15:14 GMT)

_
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:36 GMT):

7 Balir avoids a direct challenge to find out Kingston's
7 attitude for himself,

_
I see no reason why I should comply with the challenge
of Phil Innes as my purpose is to determine whether or
not Phil Innes maintains that there is writing about
book-banning in the Taylor Kingston emails. Only Phil
Innes knows what he maintains.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:36 GMT):

7 while suggesting I 'dropped' the issue. ROFL

_
What I actually wrote:
_
"Phil Innes quietly drops the issue of
book-banning while making his suggestion."
- Louis Blair (16 Dec 2006 19:27:06 -0800)
_
As everyone can see for themselves, book-banning
is not mentioned in the Sat, 16 Dec 2006
14:56:05 GMT Phil Innes suggestion (quoted above).

_
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:36 GMT):

7 WHAT does [the sentence about being distracted]
7 mean in plain English? Is that "I am not interested
7 in the subject of book banning" ? ...

_
No. I am interested in whether or not Phil Innes
maintains that there is writing about book-banning
in the Taylor Kingston emails.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:36 GMT):

7 ... Does that mean " I am interested in the subject
7 of book banning, and want no distractions" ?

_
No. I am interested in whether or not Phil Innes
maintains that there is writing about book-banning
in the Taylor Kingston emails.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:36 GMT):

7 If he doesn't want to be distracted [by me], ...

_
An incorrect hypothesis. I do not want to be distracted
by suggestion that have nothing to do with learning
about what Phil Innes maintains.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:36 GMT):

7 why doesn't he do as I suggest.

_
Only Phil Innes knows what he maintains.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:36 GMT):

7 The LUDICROUS Blair demands information from me,

_
Surely, Phil Innes knows what he maintains. Phil Innes
wouldn't want us to think that he was being deliberately
vague, would he?

_
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:36 GMT):

7 but can't even answer the simplest question directly. I
7 have no idea of what his answer means

_
"If Phil Innes has trouble with ordinary words
in English he should consult a dictionary."
- Louis Blair (14 Mar 2006 12:25:52 -0800)

_
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:36 GMT):

7 - except that he seems compeltely insincere.

_
Phil Innes has no facts to justify that nonsense.

_
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:36 GMT):

7 If anyone wants to know Kingston's attitude, then ask
7 him directly.

_
Only Phil Innes knows what he maintains.
_
"... [Wasn't Taylor Kingston] the guy who wrote
me about what banned authors should have no
right of reply at ChessCafe's own forum? ..."
- Phil Innes (Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:05:00 GMT)
_
"... Of course you haven't written [emails] 'about' book
banning, and I have never said you have written them
'about book banning' ..." - Phil Innes (to Taylor
Kingston) (Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:15:14 GMT)