But isn't it possible that one of the evil faux Sloans is reposting the
real Sloan's words on other fora, perhaps altering the verbiage
slightly, and that perhaps rgcp is one of these fora? Phil Innes could
then continue to trust in the real Sloan (who shares certain core
values with Innes), and only reject the words of Sloan's impersonators.

Otherwise, Phil Innes would have been mistaken earlier...and I would
find *that* hard to believe.


Alternatively (repositioning my tongue--no crude jokes, please)....


Isn't it possible that a man who has the capacity to adequately provide
for his children, but has not made a habit of doing so, *never was of
any use*? And that the ones who have truly outlived their usefulness
are those who knowingly used this gifted yet pathetic person to advance
their petty agendas....