Taylor Kingston wrote:

On Dec 27, 6:08 pm, "Mark Houlsby"
wrote:
LiamToo wrote:
Mark Houlsby wrote:
I just found the following article, which may cheer the theists:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...2-2517335.html

And here's the refutation:

http://www.tothesource.org/11_8_2006/11_8_2006.htm

Not sure that it genuinely *refutes* the thesis expounded in the Times
article, but it's certainly a point-of-view which is somewhat opposed.

Actually, the two articles seemed to be largely in agreement. So it's
not clear to me which is supposed to be refuting what.

I agree. That's why I wrote that I was not sure that it genuinely
refutes the other article, and why I chose the
damning-with-feint-praise phrase: "...somewhat opposed.".

Once again, our Lance demonstrates that his reading skills and his
reasoning skills are about on a par with one another....