Vince Hart wrote:
Mark Houlsby wrote:
The Historian wrote:


Very interesting, Neil. Evidently I didn't know him so well. I played
him a number of times on ICC, and we had some conversations here, but
never did he strike me as "deeply troubled," or "poisonous".

Perhaps Angelo and you knew him better, or you're more perceptive than
I am, or both.

If you never discussed Goichberg or Jarecki with him, you might never
have noticed these tendencies. On many topics, he could be amiable and
engaging. However, his rage knew no bounds when it came to anyone that
he held responsible for the martyrdom of St. Stan of Las Vegas.

Yes, and unfortunately he often introduced those topics himself.