I wrote (14 Dec 2006 13:19:22 -0800):
7 ... I am seeking identification of specific examples of
7 the moderator behavior to which Phil Innes objects. I
7 am also seeking a specific identification of the supposed
7 "less-than-honest reporting about Tanner".
_
Taylor Kingston wrote (14 Dec 2006 13:32:46 -0800):
7 Louis, you know this is an exercise in futility. Phil just
7 equivocates for several posts, never providing any specific
7 answers, then finally claims he supplied specific
7 information long ago but you somehow deleted it.
7 Fortunately readers here have seen this often enough
7 that Phil is no longer taken seriously, except by himself.
_
Phil Innes wrote (Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:05:00 GMT):
7 Look at USCF's website Forum, and also their public
7 announcements - and stop your abuse in place of a little
7 diligence, Kingston. Both these are very marked in your
7 case. I already wrote these references and Blair cut
7 them. ...
_
Taylor Kingston wrote (15 Dec 2006 07:26:50 -0800):
7 There are many posts and announcements on USCF's
7 website. Looking there does not tell us to which *_specific_*
7 posts and/or announcements you refer.
7 ...
7 Phil, I abuse you for your _lack_ of diligence. You make
7 charges without evidence.
7
7 I already wrote these references ...
7
7 You did no such thing. You have never specified what
7 you are referring to. You have not said what you
7 considered "rash and offensive abuse of speech," nor
7 what you considered "less-than-honest reporting about
7 Tanner."
7
7 and Blair cut them.
7
7 Nonsense. Blair cannot cut what was never there. He
7 cannot even cut what _is_ there, because your original
7 posts are still there, exactly as you wrote them. And
7 they contain none of the information you claim they do.
7 Your continual whining about "cutting" and "snipping"
7 is one of your most frequent, and most childish and
7 inept excuses. It is so pathetically transparent that it
7 has made you a laughingstock, Phil. ...
_
Phil Innes wrote (Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:09:20 GMT):
7 I just came across this post.
7 Somehow Taylor Kingston can't even find the 75 messages
7 about this subject, though he says he has looked. But this
7 is my fault! He can't find them, he says, therefore there is
7 no 'evidence'
_
Reading "the 75 messages" would not, by itself, have
revealed that Phil Innes was referring to Herbert Vaughn as
the moderator. After all, Herbert Vaughn is not the moderator.
_
Phil Innes wrote (Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:09:20 GMT):
7 You did no such thing. You have never specified what
7 you are referring to. You have not said what you
7 considered "rash and offensive abuse of speech," nor
7 what you considered "less-than-honest reporting about
7 Tanner."
7
7 Yes I have! But maybe you can't find those either?
7 Therefore... its not your fault, therefore the issue does
7 not exist. How pathetic!
_
It was on Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:34:04 GMT (AFTER the above
Taylor Kingston quotes) that Phil Innes identified specific
Herbert Vaughn quotes, referring to them as coming from
the moderator. It was on Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:38:14 GMT
that Phil Innes acknowledged that Herbert Vaughn was not
(in the words of Phil Innes himself) "the real moderator".
_
Phil Innes wrote (Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:09:20 GMT):
7 your original posts are still there, exactly as you wrote
7 them. And they contain none of the information you
7 claim they do.
7
7 What information? Be specific otherwise you are merely
7 Vaguer-than-thou! If you can't find this material at USCF's
7 forum, jovially known as Nolanland, then I say you are
7 not looking very hard. Lots of other people found it, so
7 you must consider that it is you, not me. ...
_
Who specifically knew what supposed moderator
misbehavior Phil Innes was referring to, before Phil Innes
revealed that he was referring to Herbert Vaughn (who is
not the moderator) as the moderator? Who, even now,
knows what supposedly "less-than-honest reporting about
Tanner" was being mentioned by Phil Innes?
_
About two weeks ago, I wrote:
_
"... I have seen an 'announcements' page
that contained a link for details about the
recent resignation. Is that where the
supposedly 'less-than-honest reporting
about Tanner' can be accessed? (The
'report' begins: 'On Dec. 4, 2006, USCF
Executive Board Secretary Robert B.
Tanner resigned. ...')
_
Would Phil Innes care to be specific about
which previous Phil Innes note supposedly
referred to 'their public announcements'? ..."
- Louis Blair (15 Dec 2006 10:44:37 -0800)
_
I still have not seen Phil Innes answer those questions.