Mark Houlsby wrote:
Rob wrote:

Mark Houlsby wrote:
Rob wrote:

Mark Houlsby wrote:
The Historian wrote:


The HOUSLBY CHALLENGE: Specifically let me turn this on you - and if you
wish to state that the material exists, then presumably you will retract
your [abstract] ****-talk and calm down, otherwise the term net-nazi suits
you well.

I wait your response.


Would Mr. or Ms. Holsby, whoever you are, please translate this? It's a
complete nonsense.


I have no idea who this "Holsby" person is, but I have already asked
the nearly an IM to put into plain English what the "HOUSLBY CHALLENGE"
actually is....

The inferrance by "?" was that Mr. Innes was inventing a scandle.


Yes. That would be because he had produced no evidence suggesting
scandal (or scandle, for that matter).

Did he not comment that he was reporting on what was being decried a
scandal on the USCF forum?( caution: this may actually require doing
your own legwork and reading)


He did comment to that effect, but, as has been stated many, many times
TROLL... he is the ONLY person who sees EVIDENCE of a scandal.

Dear "?" you are projecting your "trollier than thow " attitude
everywhere. I will not play your "troll games"

Mr.
Innes responded that he was merely using the language of the poster
from the USCF forum and that if "?" doubted the validity he should
verify that himself before making scurllious remarks. To which "?"
declined saying he didn't need to prove anything to anyone.

That is a bald-faced lie by Rob Mitchell. I tried, several times (as
did Dr. Blair) to elicit such information from Phil Innes, but no such
information was forthcoming.

That is not a lie. Show me where you didn't say that? ( That should
keep you busy chasing your tail till New Years!)



Ok Rob, there are lots of places where I didn't say it. The easiest
way to answer this Rob's request is to indicate where I *did* write
(rather than say) it:

http://tinyurl.com/yctfsf

oh, give me a break! The ability to hyper link a failed argument is in
no way proof of anything except you still have no idea about what is
going on. LOL

If you look anywhere else, you're liable to be disappointed. Is it New
Year's yet? Guess not.

Check... you still have provided nothing of value to this argument "?".
You still have time.

You now owe me an apology, Rob Mitchell.

Just subtract it from the dozen or so you owe me, "?".



Give me an example, and I shall apologise immediately. One thing which
frequent posters note about me is that I am frequently in the wrong.
Whenever I am in the wrong, and notice that I am, I write *something*
to the effect: "Mea culpa". Whenever I fail to notice, I am always
pleased if someone is kind enough to point out that what I have written
deserves a "Mea culpa" or an apology. So, where did I slight you?

You are so full of yourself. Show me Proof that you aren't. I will be
judge and jury of that proof. Now, I will also point out you are often
time the first person to shout "troll" in any argument you are losing.
Just remember "?" it is the guilty dog that barks first and loudest.

He simply
wanted to blindly castigate his percieved enemies in a vain attempt at
ego inflation.


Another lie. I require evidence in support of a scandal, is all. Two
apolgies you owe me.


On this one I do not as I will not say that I am sorry for the opinion
I hold of you due to your actions.



So you admit to your being a troll then. Interesting.

There you go again! You request for an answer and when it isnt the one
you want you yell "troll" LOL What a childish exercise. I can see
you arguing with children over playing video games! Are you really
Jason Repa?

Very sad ending to "?" 's reputation, I think.
Oh, I forgot, "?"'s reputation could only improve if it ended.... LOL
my-bad!


Well, there are those who would disagree with that assessment of my
assessment of Phil Innes' posting record:

There were alsoscore who argued that Copernicus was wrong about the
Earth revolving about the Sun.


This is true. Evidence proved Copernicus right. Evidence proves that
Phil and you are in the minority.

Louis Blair, Engineer, Kenneth Sloan, Chess Freak, Guy Macon, Greg
Kennedy, Christopher Mattern, rexartu..., Taylor Kingston, Neil
Brennen, Steve Dowd, Mike Murray, James Rynd, Matt Nemmers, David
Richerby, Mark Wing, Henri H. Arsenault, vkarlamov, Wick Deer, Larry
Tapper, g4, Tom Martinak, Randy Bauer, Vince Hart, Don Schultz, Bill
Brock, David Kane, Joel Channing, parker.r..., sivad..., Stan Booz,...

Get with the program, or go away, TROLL.

I would confirm your list first "?" , some of those you placed in your
"list" are actually would not concur with being on your list. I suggest
you find them and then post their responses on this newsgroup anong
with the affirmative posts from the others you listed. Put up or shut
up, oh "Queen of trolls".


Ok. Here are the specific posts to which I refer:

http://tinyurl.com/ye57fq Louis Blair


http://tinyurl.com/y9g48u Engineer


http://tinyurl.com/yg7k7h Kenneth Sloan


http://tinyurl.com/ykccnw Chess Freak


http://tinyurl.com/yjrrga Guy Macon


http://tinyurl.com/yg4lec Greg Kennedy


http://tinyurl.com/yzamhw Christopher Mattern


http://tinyurl.com/yjp37d rexartu...


http://tinyurl.com/ylyycx Taylor Kingston


http://tinyurl.com/ym4gvq Neil Brennen


http://tinyurl.com/y5yzay Steve Dowd --- pay particular attention to
this one.


http://tinyurl.com/y4r8j9 Mike Murray


http://tinyurl.com/y6d7nz James Rynd ---pay particular attention to
this one.


http://tinyurl.com/y6tlbx Matt Nemmers


http://tinyurl.com/v5za4 David Richerby


http://tinyurl.com/vt8lb Mark Wing, a.k.a. "Nick Bourbaki"


http://tinyurl.com/v3o46 Henri H. Arsenault


http://tinyurl.com/y3rfou vkarlamov


http://tinyurl.com/vqhce Wick Deer


http://tinyurl.com/yzkjax Larry Tapper


http://tinyurl.com/y2txlf g4


http://tinyurl.com/y9eqzx Tom Martinak


http://tinyurl.com/yd42gw Randy Bauer


http://tinyurl.com/yn6y5x Vince Hart


http://tinyurl.com/yzccg9 Don Schultz


http://tinyurl.com/ya2rgc Bill Brock


http://tinyurl.com/y7w2k6 David Kane


http://tinyurl.com/y4wjtf Joel Channing


http://tinyurl.com/wwzjv parker.r... (whose vernacular prose style
seems Houlsbyesque)


http://tinyurl.com/y67kv3 sivad...


http://tinyurl.com/yfrcev Stan Booz

Now, I already posted that list to you. If you *still* don't accept its
accuracy, it's up to *you* to go through it and take issue with
*everyone* in the list.



Look . Unless you have a direct affirmation of their feelings and an
un-cut and unedited confirmation from each of those affirming their
agreement with you on Mr. Inneses honesty, then go away ! You are
putting words in their mouths. Should anyone have the inclination they
too could construct a false impression of your undying love of Adolph
Hitler.

Put up or shut up, self-confessed TROLL.

There you go again "?".. guilty dog barking!



Rob

Is it New Year's yet?

Mark Houlsby

Mark Houlsby

Rob