Ange1o DePa1ma wrote:
"Vince Hart" wrote in message
oups.com...

Ange1o DePa1ma wrote:

Nor do I think that Dawkins would consider anyone an idiot for thinking
that their might be an intelligent designer. I do think he considers
to be idiots those people who want creationism taught along with (if
not instead of) evolution in public school science classes.

Once upon a time, science did not have an explanation for mental
illness, so people attributed it to demon possession. The fact that
science does not provide a satisfying explanation for some phenomenon
currently does not mean that it is incapable of ever explaining it, or
that a supernatural explanation is necessary or preferable.

I should point out that the current theories of mental illness are only
slightly more functional and non-mythical than beliefs of the 19th century.

How does that relate to my point about preferring a natural explanation
to a supernatural explanation?