THE SMEAR CAMPAIGN

On an almost daily basis Bill Brock tries to change the
subject from his original charge that Sam Sloan
molested children to other issues, such as Sam being
"seamy" and the like.

That was also the burden of a posting by Vinnie
Hart. I wrote that Sam was not a criminal in the
natural law sense of the word and that he served time
for an affair of the heart that would not have been in
the courts a couple of generations back. Mr. Hart
then posted the view of a court that Sam was a bad
father, unreliable and so on. I don't know whether
that is true or whether a judge was chipping in to
support the viewpoint of another government agency;
but so far as I can see, Mr. Hart backed the essential
point that I made.

So, then, we still have no proof that Sam ever
molested any child. We do have endless attacks on his
employment status, his living circumstances, his
tending to his baby's diapers at a board meeting, etc.

To the extent that anyone on this forum has ever
provided evidence of someone being a child molester,
Bill Brock has done so. He wrote some nonsense about
HIMSELF that, as I have repeatedly stipulated, he
likely did not mean to write. Still, that is the only
evidence of child molestation we have; and if one were
to take Mr. Brock's words seriously, which I did not
and do not, we also have proof in the form of a
confession that he is a child molester. Some might
draw the conclusion, though I emphatically do not,
that Mr. Brock assaults Sam on a daily basis to assuage his
own sense of guilt.