View Single Post
  #7  
Old January 19th 07, 06:21 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
politikalhack@gmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 662
Default Both Innes and Parr find Sloan's site unproblematic, even though it's designed to introduce soft porn to minors....

wrote:
So who do you believe, Sloan or S. Polgar?


Polgar claims that, while a minor, Sloan sexually propositioned her.

WRT Polgar, I do not claim that Sloan's proposition was illegal. As
Sloan has shown, the age of consent in Hungary is 14. Sloan has twice
intimated that a sexual relationship was in fact consummated. (Both
intimations were made in the course of conducting USCF business--rather
strange.) One might infer that both parties agree that a proposition
was made.

Adults should not sexually proposition minors. How's that for a
standard, kiddo?

***

I realize that Parr and Innes are transparent in their desire to
destroy USCF. But they should not feel wedded to Sloan: they can find
a more ethical agent of destruction.

Ads
 

Golf Store - Cycling Training Logs - Credit Counseling - Mortgage Calculator - Data security