William Brock, you are as obsessed by Sloan, as Sloan is so obviously
obsessed of S. Polgar! The only thing you perpetuate here is personality
obsession - you blithely exhibit the same behavior as the thing you resent.

You are also an insufficient person to address these issues to other
people - as if you really wanted to know my opinion ROFL! - but continuously
snip it, proving to everyone but yourself that this is all about you )

Sam Sloan knows exactly what I think of his deportment about women as sex
objects. He is shy of meeting those points, which I absolutely made sure he
could fairly review by posting them in front on his nose in his own forum.

Why should I condemn Sloan as a villain, if, in my consideration, more
considerable villains exist? Especially less obvious and secret ones, who,
IMO, are more likely to act than people whose braggadocio is like 13 year
olds?

If you were at all genuinely concerned for women and children you would have
addressed my proposal to empower women and parents to conference and make
recommendations to whoever is interested in acting on them.

You have amply demonstrated that you are not such a person - and for this
reason! - neither should you audit other people's welfare.

Phil Innes


wrote in message
oups.com...
You skipped to question 4, without addressing questions 1 through 3.

1. Did Susan Polgar make Statement A, dated July 27, 2006, and quoted
in full [upthread]?

2. Did Sam Sloan make Statement B below in USCF BINFO 200603590, dated
September 26, 2006, and quoted in full (with email address redactions)
[upthread]?

3. Did Sloan make Statement C [upthread] on January 5, 2007, as his
full
response to Count 13 of a USCF ethics complaint?