The USCF lost $344,225 - Vote for Sloan, Schultz, Goodall and Lux
On Feb 3, 9:06 pm, "samsloan" wrote:
The USCF lost $344,225 in 2006. This is far less than the $2,000,000
other boards have lost. This is why you must re-elect Don Schultz and
me and elect Mike Goodall and Joe Lux. The USCF is better off in our
hands.
How so? Do you, Don Shultz, Mike Goodall and Joe Lux have a track
record of losing less than the amount mentioned above when it comes
to running the USCF? If so, what is your average loss per year? And
how many more years of these losses can the USCF endure before
drowning in a sea of debt?
I've played by all the rules set up until now. This organization
belongs to the USCF members and we deserve better than the management
we are getting.
Um, Mr. Sloan, are you not *already* a member of this management
"team" to which you refer?
d) Unreconciled Web Income. What is this exactly? My understanding is
that we cannot match our receipts to the items paid for by the web. Is
that an accurate explanation? How is that possible?
Mr. Sloan, you are a lot smarter than I had imagined; you have just
uncovered the secret slush fund account, code named: UWI.
h) Miscellaneous Expenses are $26k over budget. Exactly what are these
expenses?
Once again, bravo; you have uncovered one of the many accounts
used to funnel monies into or out of the secret slush fund account.
How ever are you doing this?
Balance Sheet bottom line as of December 31, 2006
Net Loss: $344,225.
Total Capital: ($474,640)
Sending you the trial balance by email.
Maybe now we can talk about something that's a lot more important than
what Mr. Sloan has on his website.
Nonsense; money cannot be more important than sex. The only thing
that tops sex is playing chess with a beautiful woman as you both lie
naked
on a sun-drenched beach, listening to the dolphins sing: "Tralala la
la la la,
there's peace and good will, I think, I'm gonna mate you on
Mockingbird
Hill." Well, it topped sex in one of my dreams, anyway....
-- finance bot
|