Johnny T wrote:
David Richerby wrote:
Nonsense.

First, I *said*, that depending on you measure it, it may be
sufficient, or insufficient.

You said,

``First, philosophically, it is insufficient. Chess is not solved up
until the tablebases. Therefore, the opening books, by definition,
are unsolved, and because they are unsolved, they are on surface,
insufficient.''

I explained why this is nonsense. If you have a problem with that,
please address it before accusing me of being closed to new ideas.


Dave.

--
David Richerby Mouldy Radioactive Wine (TM): it's
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ like a vintage Beaujolais but it'll
make you glow in the dark and it's
starting to grow mushrooms!