"help bot" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 21, 3:18 am, "Jason 911" wrote:

Is the initial position in chess a mutual Zugswang?

If that were the case, i think you'd see black win a higher % of the
time
instead of white, no?

Assumes perfect or near-perfect play by humans

Not at all simpleton.

Ad hominem diversionary tactic noted.

You learned a new term today eh? Not bad for an idiot. But as typical idiots
go you're unable to understand what the term means as the vast majority of
your psuedo "argument" is pure ad-hominem drivel such as your juvenile
suggestion that my "mating" Keven Gentes "on the board" as was clearly
stated, has something to do with having sex with him. This could also, in
your case, be a form of "projection" (another new term for you to learn) as
you've made your latent homosexuality quite obvious to the readers here.

I know you're not a very bright kid, but read over my post s.l.o.w.l.y and
hopefully some of it will sink in.


If after tens of thousands of games white is winning by a greater
margin,
then statistically white has the advantage.

Indeed, the original question had naught to do with statistics

Actually you're wrong. Statistics is a method for gaining insight in such
issues. Current tablebase depth and chess engine technology are not
sufficient to provide concrete answers at this point. Again, kid, you're the
one making the assumptions here. This is way over your head son.


I think,

This was your first error kid......trying to "think". It's like a dog trying
to speak. Sometimes they come close but......

pertaining to the
idea of *perfect play* by both sides.

Nope, you better learn how to read and lay off the pot for awhile because
your comprehension and short term memory leave a great deal to be desired.
I'll refresh your memory son. The original thread question was:

Is the initial position in chess a mutual zugzwang?

Did you look up the word "zugzwang" yet help bitch? You obviously don't know
what it means. I'll spell it out for you in the way an idiot like yourself
can understand.

Zugzwang isn't conditional on whether or not the play is "perfect" or "less
than perfect" it has nothing whatsoever to do with that. Zugzwang means that
regardless of the play, there is no move that can be made such that the
position does not worsen. Is some of this sinking in yet?



ps, I've mated both Kevin (on the board), and his late wife (off the
board)

FYI: Having sexual relations with a male....

FYI, how incredibly dumb do you have to be to not understand the phrase
"on
the board" you degenerate faggot?

Just *where* the creature that calls itself Jason Repa conducts his
"affairs" is of no concern to me;

More ad-hominem attacks from the hypocrite idiot that cries like a baby when
people attack him. It's quite hillarious how you just DIRECTLY CONTRADICTED
yourself, even in the very same post.

And you are of absolutely no concern whatsoever to anybody here (except for
your alternate ID's, lol), nor do you speak for anyone here other than
yourself "help boy". Nobody here could care less what your opinion is on
anything.


I would like to point out that, were we to
compile a large database of games played between strong chess
programs, even so we would not be able to address the poster's
true question,

Actually it would. The only thing you're pointing out here is that you have
a very modest IQ and are unable to think outside of the box. As I stated
before, we don't, at this stage, have technology such as 32 piece
tablebases, or some supercomputer that could crunch the sufficient # of
nodes such to concretely determine the absolute evaluation of the starting
position in chess. But we can gain insight into what is likely to be the
case using statistical analysis. Insurance companies, the stock market, and
all casinos utilize this type of information in order to conduct their
business.

JMR